skip to content
~/docs~/integrations~/faq

compare / zeroshot

Aethereum vs ZeroShot

ZeroShot records your team's AI coding sessions into its cloud, extracts knowledge and skills from the transcripts, and scores developers against each other, at $100 per user per month behind a waitlist. Aethereum starts from the opposite premise: transcripts contain your code, so they stay on your machine. Usage syncs as numbers only when a room opts in, session handoffs move end-to-end encrypted, and there are no rankings, by stance rather than by omission.

compared here: ZeroShot session capture, skills, usage insights, PR compliance

The honest comparison

Capability by capability. Green means yes, amber means partial, a dash means no. Where ZeroShot is genuinely stronger, the table says so.

How Aethereum compares to other approaches across the capabilities that matter for coordinating AI coding agents.
capabilityAethereumZeroShot
Cross-machine coordinationyesagents on different machines share one brainpartialsessions sync to their cloud; no agent-to-agent coordination
Cross-developer awarenessyesyour agent sees a teammate's uncommitted changepartiala shared session repository, not live agent awareness
Works with any MCP agentyesClaude Code, Cursor, Codex, anything MCPpartialcaptures popular CLIs; coordination is not an open MCP surface
Shared interface contractsyesdeclare_contract, versioned + dependency-awarenono interface-contract concept
Contract negotiationyespropose, push back, finalize a shape changenono negotiation; skills are pushed via weekly PRs
Collision alert before mergeyeswarned the moment a dependency changesnoskill compliance on PRs, not interface-collision alerts
Operator directivesyesone standing order pins to every agent's contextnono standing operator directive
Soft-lock claimsyesclaim a file, overlap is flagged to othersnono claims
Tickets / work assignmentyesassign tickets to agents from the cockpitnono tickets
Durable team memoryyesdecisions + plan persist across sessions + machinesyesper-session extractions: decisions, blockers, conventions
Live dashboardyeswatch the whole fleet coordinate in real timeyeslive sessions view; some dashboards labelled Illustrative
CLI cockpityesaethereum mission to steer from the terminalpartialdesktop app + menu bar, not a CLI cockpit
GitHub / Slack / Linearpartialintegrations are earlypartialPR compliance board + weekly skill PRs
MCP-nativeyesthe whole surface is MCP toolsnoclosed extraction pipeline, not MCP
Source code stays privateyesby default only the interfaces an agent publishes leave the machine; opt-in code sharing is end-to-end encrypted, so the server holds only ciphertext it cannot readnoextraction requires server-readable transcripts; no published encryption model
Zero-install / quick setupyesone command, about thirty secondsnowaitlist + demo call to start
Pricingyesfree to start, no cardno$100 per user per month, free tier capped at 3 members

where aethereum is stronger

  • Transcripts never leave your machine; the extraction happens locally (aethereum distill).
  • Session handoff between machines is end-to-end encrypted; the server stores only ciphertext.
  • Free during beta, accountless start, no waitlist or demo call.
  • Team-level metrics only. No leaderboards, no per-person scores, ever.
  • Coordination rail underneath: shared interface contracts, negotiation, pre-merge collision alerts.

where zeroshot is stronger

  • A polished managed pipeline: capture, extraction, and knowledge curation run as a service with no local tooling to think about.
  • Automatic per-session extractions (decisions, blockers, conventions) out of the box.
  • A packaged starter-skills library and weekly skill-update PRs.

When to use which

use aethereum: Use Aethereum when your sessions touch code you would not paste into a third-party cloud, when you want the coordination rail (contracts, alerts, handoff) and honest team-level numbers without ranking developers.

use zeroshot: Use ZeroShot if you want a fully managed capture-and-insights service, are comfortable with transcripts being readable server-side, and the per-seat price works for your team.

Common questions

Does Aethereum upload my transcripts like ZeroShot does?

No. The session index and every scan run locally. The only session-related things that can leave your machine are numbers-only usage rollups a room explicitly opts into, and end-to-end encrypted handoff blobs the server cannot read.

Does Aethereum rank developers?

No, and it will not. Metrics are totals for the room and a private view for you. DORA's 2025 research is the reason: individual AI-usage metrics mislead, and ranking developers on them makes engineering worse, not better.

What does Aethereum cost compared to ZeroShot?

ZeroShot's published price is $100 per user per month, with a free tier capped at 3 members, behind a waitlist. Aethereum is free during beta with an accountless start; billing stays off.

Can I get skills from my sessions like ZeroShot's extraction?

Yes, locally. aethereum distill scans your indexed sessions for repeated friction and drafts SKILL.md files with your own agent. Nothing publishes without a preview and your explicit confirmation.

Make your agents one team.

Free, no signup, no card. One command, about thirty seconds. Your agents share contracts, claim what they touch, and warn each other before merge.

get started free →