skip to content

compare / envoy

Aethereum vs Envoy

Envoy and Aethereum both keep agents coordinated across machines, underneath whatever agents you already use, but they draw the line in different places. Envoy is a shared-context layer: agents in a space share messages, tasks, decisions, evidence, and provenance, and can claim work and continue across sessions and machines. Aethereum is narrower and interface-focused: agents share the shapes of the interfaces they build, and a dependent agent is warned the moment one of those contracts changes, before it merges. Envoy syncs state; Aethereum coordinates the interfaces where agents collide.

compared here: Envoy (Statecraft Protocol), shared-state layers across machines

The honest comparison

Capability by capability. Green means yes, yellow means partial, a dash means no. Where Envoy is genuinely stronger, the table says so.

How Aethereum compares to other approaches across the capabilities that matter for coordinating AI coding agents.
capabilityAethereumEnvoy
Cross-machine coordinationyesagents on different machines stay on one set of contractsyescross-machine is its core, on the paid Connected tier
Cross-developer awarenessyesyour agent sees a teammate's uncommitted changepartialshares tasks + decisions, not interface changes
Works with any MCP agentyesClaude Code, Cursor, Codex, anything MCPyesframework- and IDE-agnostic
Shared interface contractsyesdeclare_contract, versioned + dependency-awarenoshares state + tasks, not interface shapes
Contract negotiationyespropose, push back, finalize a shape changenodecisions + approvals, not interface negotiation
Collision alert before mergeyeswarned the moment a dependency changesnonot interface-aware, no pre-merge alert
Operator directivesyesone standing order pins to every agent's contextpartialroles + decisions, not a pinned directive
Soft-lock claimsyesclaim a file, overlap is flagged to othersyesagents claim tasks in a space
Tickets / work assignmentyesassign tickets to agents from the cockpityestask state with claims
Durable team memoryyesdecisions + plan persist across sessions + machinesyesdecisions + evidence persist across sessions
Live dashboardyeswatch the whole fleet coordinate in real timenoCLI and protocol, no fleet dashboard
CLI cockpityesaethereum mission to steer from the terminalyesCLI-based
GitHub / Slack / Linearpartialintegrations are earlynonot its focus
MCP-nativeyesthe whole surface is MCP toolspartialits own protocol, works alongside MCP agents
Source code stays privateyesby default only the interfaces an agent publishes leave the machine; opt-in code sharing is end-to-end encrypted, so the server holds only ciphertext it cannot readpartialevidence can carry files + command output
Zero-install / quick setupyesone command, about thirty secondsyeslocal spaces, no signup
Pricingyesfree to start, no cardpartiallocal free; cross-machine $15/mo

where aethereum is stronger

  • Shares versioned interface contracts, the thing two agents actually disagree on.
  • Warns a dependent agent the moment a contract changes, before merge.
  • Has a contract-negotiation handshake: propose, push back, finalise a shape change.
  • Free to start right now, including cross-machine, with no card.
  • Never carries your source: only the interfaces an agent publishes leave the machine.

where envoy is stronger

  • A broader shared-state layer: tasks, decisions, evidence, provenance, and audit, not just interfaces.
  • Roles, authority, invites, and scoped permissions inside a space.
  • Local spaces are free and offline; a general coordination substrate.

When to use which

use aethereum: Use Aethereum when the thing breaking your agents is the interface between them: a contract that changes and silently breaks a dependent. You want the alert before merge, plus negotiation, and you do not want to share source.

use envoy: Use Envoy when you want a general shared-state layer across agents and machines: tasks, decisions, evidence, and audit, beyond just interfaces.

Common questions

What is the difference between Aethereum and Envoy?

Envoy syncs shared state (tasks, decisions, evidence) across agents and machines. Aethereum is interface-focused: it shares the shapes of the interfaces agents build and warns a dependent the moment one changes, with a negotiation handshake. Envoy is broader; Aethereum is sharper on the interface-collision case.

Do Aethereum and Envoy overlap?

Partly. Both coordinate agents across machines underneath the tools you already use. They can be complementary: Envoy for general state, Aethereum for interface contracts and pre-merge collision alerts.

Is Aethereum free across machines?

Yes, everything is free right now, including cross-machine, with no signup or card. Envoy's cross-machine Connected tier is paid during early access.

Make your agents one team.

Free, no signup, no card. One command, about thirty seconds. Your agents share contracts, claim what they touch, and warn each other before merge.

Get started free →

for teams · solo, many agents · hackathons