skip to content
~/docs~/integrations~/skills~/faq

compare / envoy

Aethereum vs Envoy

Envoy and Aethereum both keep agents coordinated across machines, underneath whatever agents you already use, but they draw the line in different places. Envoy is a shared-context layer: agents in a space share messages, tasks, decisions, evidence, and provenance, and can claim work and continue across sessions and machines. Aethereum is narrower and interface-focused: agents share the shapes of the interfaces they build, and a dependent agent is warned the moment one of those contracts changes, before it merges. Envoy syncs state; Aethereum coordinates the interfaces where agents collide.

compared here: Envoy (Statecraft Protocol), shared-state layers across machines

The honest comparison

Capability by capability. Green means yes, amber means partial, a dash means no. Where Envoy is genuinely stronger, the table says so.

How Aethereum compares to other approaches across the capabilities that matter for coordinating AI coding agents.
capabilityAethereumEnvoy
Cross-machine coordinationyesagents on different machines share one brainyescross-machine is its core, on the paid Connected tier
Cross-developer awarenessyesyour agent sees a teammate's uncommitted changepartialshares tasks + decisions, not interface changes
Works with any MCP agentyesClaude Code, Cursor, Codex, anything MCPyesframework- and IDE-agnostic
Shared interface contractsyesdeclare_contract, versioned + dependency-awarenoshares state + tasks, not interface shapes
Contract negotiationyespropose, push back, finalize a shape changenodecisions + approvals, not interface negotiation
Collision alert before mergeyeswarned the moment a dependency changesnonot interface-aware, no pre-merge alert
Operator directivesyesone standing order pins to every agent's contextpartialroles + decisions, not a pinned directive
Soft-lock claimsyesclaim a file, overlap is flagged to othersyesagents claim tasks in a space
Tickets / work assignmentyesassign tickets to agents from the cockpityestask state with claims
Durable team memoryyesdecisions + plan persist across sessions + machinesyesdecisions + evidence persist across sessions
Live dashboardyeswatch the whole fleet coordinate in real timenoCLI and protocol, no fleet dashboard
CLI cockpityesaethereum mission to steer from the terminalyesCLI-based
GitHub / Slack / Linearpartialintegrations are earlynonot its focus
MCP-nativeyesthe whole surface is MCP toolspartialits own protocol, works alongside MCP agents
No source code sharedyesonly the interfaces an agent publishes leave the machinepartialevidence can carry files + command output
Zero-install / quick setupyesone command, about thirty secondsyeslocal spaces, no signup
Pricingyesfree to start, no cardpartiallocal free; cross-machine $15/mo

where aethereum is stronger

  • Shares versioned interface contracts, the thing two agents actually disagree on.
  • Warns a dependent agent the moment a contract changes, before merge.
  • Has a contract-negotiation handshake: propose, push back, finalise a shape change.
  • Free to start right now, including cross-machine, with no card.
  • Never carries your source: only the interfaces an agent publishes leave the machine.

where envoy is stronger

  • A broader shared-state layer: tasks, decisions, evidence, provenance, and audit, not just interfaces.
  • Roles, authority, invites, and scoped permissions inside a space.
  • Local spaces are free and offline; a general coordination substrate.

When to use which

use aethereum: Use Aethereum when the thing breaking your agents is the interface between them: a contract that changes and silently breaks a dependent. You want the alert before merge, plus negotiation, and you do not want to share source.

use envoy: Use Envoy when you want a general shared-state layer across agents and machines: tasks, decisions, evidence, and audit, beyond just interfaces.

Common questions

What is the difference between Aethereum and Envoy?

Envoy syncs shared state (tasks, decisions, evidence) across agents and machines. Aethereum is interface-focused: it shares the shapes of the interfaces agents build and warns a dependent the moment one changes, with a negotiation handshake. Envoy is broader; Aethereum is sharper on the interface-collision case.

Do Aethereum and Envoy overlap?

Partly. Both coordinate agents across machines underneath the tools you already use. They can be complementary: Envoy for general state, Aethereum for interface contracts and pre-merge collision alerts.

Is Aethereum free across machines?

Yes, everything is free right now, including cross-machine, with no signup or card. Envoy's cross-machine Connected tier is paid during early access.

Give your agents a shared brain.

Free, no signup, no card. One command, about thirty seconds. Your agents share contracts, claim what they touch, and warn each other before merge.

get started free →